You’re in good company

A few of the companies we’ve worked with.

Easy to start, harder to measure

Turning on a coding assistant, which suggests and edits code as you work, takes an afternoon. Knowing whether it helps takes longer. How much faster the work feels isn’t always how much faster it moves, and time saved writing code can be spent again in review, testing and rework.

The same is true of coding agents, which take a task and work through it. Whether either one helps depends less on the tool than on how your team reviews, tests and releases.

Team settings

Coding assistantOn

Is the work getting better?

Needs a baseline

What we set up with your team

The tools, and the way of working around them.

  • Tools chosen for your codebase

    Compared on your own code, your security needs and how each one handles your data, then tried with one team.

  • Context the agents can use

    Your conventions, architecture notes and commands written where agents read them, so their changes follow how your team builds.

  • Safe access

    Agents work with only the access a job needs: their own workspace, no production credentials and no secrets in reach.

  • Review rules

    What a change needs before it merges, however it was written: an owner, the same review and tests, and a size a person can read.

  • Checks on every change

    Tests, security scans and license checks that run on every change, in the pipeline you already have.

  • Jobs agents can take on

    Well-defined work handed to an agent that opens a change for review: library upgrades, missing tests, small migrations and documentation.

  • Training on your own code

    Hands-on sessions with your engineers, on your own code and real work.

  • A measure of what changes

    A baseline taken before rollout, then the same delivery measures after it: how long changes take, how long they wait for review, and how often they fail or come back.

Measure the work, not the feeling

Ask engineers how much faster they are, and the answer is sincere, but it can be far from what’s measured. So we measure your own work, before and after: how long a change takes to reach users, how long it waits for review, and how often it fails or comes back. Lines written and suggestions accepted show how much a tool is used. They don’t show whether the work got better.

Read the evidence:Do AI coding assistants make teams faster? →

  • Lines written
  • Suggestions accepted
  • Time people say they saved

Shows how much a tool is used

  • Time to reach users
  • Time waiting for review
  • Changes that fail or come back

Shows whether the work got better

{{ msSay }}

Split into changes a person can read, each with its owner

A person reads every change

An agent can draft a change in minutes. Someone still has to understand it before it merges, and answer for it afterward. We help you keep changes small enough to read, make the owner of each one clear, and use AI as an extra reader, never the only one.

Clear limits for agents

An agent that can run commands can also run the wrong one. So each one works in its own space, with the access its job needs and a record of what it ran. Nothing it reads, in a file, a ticket or a web page, can grant it a permission.

Prompt injection, and rules for AI across the business:AI Security & Governance →

Job

Upgrade one library

Can

  • Read the code
  • Run the tests
  • Open a change for review

Can’t

  • Merge it
  • Deploy it
  • Reach production
Nothing it reads can grant a permission.

Start with one team

We start with one team and one kind of work. We take a baseline, set up the tools, the rules and the training, and work alongside your engineers. Then you see what changed against the baseline, and decide whether to widen it, adjust it or stop.

Questions worth asking

Does code written with AI need different review?

The same review as any other change, with extra attention to what’s easy to miss: edge cases, error handling, and tests that only repeat what the code already does.

QA & Test Automation →

Who’s responsible for code an agent writes?

The person who merges it, as with any other change. Our review rules make the owner of each change clear.

What if it doesn’t help?

Then the baseline shows it, and you’ve learned it with one team rather than the whole organization.

Let’s ship it better

Tell us how your team works today. We’ll suggest where coding agents could help first, and how you’ll know.

Thanks, we’ll be in touch soon.

{{ ctaStatus }}